Have you ever heard the phrase “We have a branding issue”?
I have.
Here’s my hunch: it probably isn’t a branding issue. Most company and personal branding issues at their core are issues with their product or partner relations.
(That statement is probably causing some furious marketing guy or gal who specializes in branding to write a long retort. Maybe I should clarify?)
Okay, so there is an instance where branding is an issue: You’ve got a great product but nobody knows about it. Even then though, it really is more of a PR or advertising issue than a branding issue.
Let’s Fix The Product And Relationships, Not The Brand
Take Monster.com. They are well known to both consumers and business owners. At times, their product is bashed as expensive, ineffective and losing relevancy. Yet what is the solution that many analysts (and Monster themselves) have recommended over the years? Rebrand, rebrand, rebrand.
It doesn’t work. Look at Monster through the years (historical images courtesy of archive.org):
- Monster.com – 2000
- Monster.com – 2005
- Monster.com – 2010
Click through to each one of those sites and it screams at you to SEARCH FOR A JOB. For ten FREAKING years, that’s been the message. So what exactly is there to rebrand? Monster.com has a branding problem only if SEARCH FOR A JOB isn’t the primary purpose of the site. I suspect that Monster.com thinks that searching for a job is still incredibly important. Just a hunch.
Certainly part of the brand is reputation. So if Monster.com has a branding problem because of reputation, it is probably due to either a product issue or a bunch of busted up relationships with important people. That doesn’t mean you spend a couple mil on rebranding your product with a slick logo, front page redesign and an ad in the NY Times, you spend a couple mil on fixing your product and repairing those relationships. The brand improvement will ultimately follow those two actions.
Monster may be figuring this out. They put Eric Winegardner out in their community of business partners. They may have figured out that fixing the brand means fixing the core issues that will help improve both their brand and profitability.
Personal Branding Mission: You Are Who You Are
Some say Generation Y may not be getting jobs because they aren’t properly marketing themselves. They turn to personal branding to boost their profiles. Sites like Brazen Careerist actively encourage their Gen Y members to post to their “idea” stream. Since millennials don’t have much experience, they have to compensate by creating a stream of ideas that may or may not impress the ruling class of Boomers and Gen Xers.
Here’s what I know: it is a stretch to build a personal brand on ideas. Again, the brand isn’t the problem here. The problem is that there is little experience to backup those ideas. And great ideas don’t come without context and understanding. And context and understanding doesn’t just come from thin air.
Instead of worrying about personal branding, how about worrying about doing things that create both experience and ideas? If you ever get to the point where you have to worry about how you are going to position all of these great experiences, then you can talk about branding. I don’t want to read another blog by a so called “web design expert” that has been freelancing for three months and their entire portfolio fits above the fold on my browser. Whoever is telling people that assuming the role of an expert is good for their personal brand when they are not an expert is just giving really terrible advice.
We Cling To Brand Because It Is Easy
It is easy to blame a brand. It is easier to rebrand. It doesn’t take any responsibility for a broken business process (or your own experiences). It simply says “No, we’re not the problem. Other people’s perceptions of us are the real problem here.” And then you make your can smile and do other superficial actions and it makes us think that image is the only problem to address. That’s like changing a lamp shade when a light bulb goes out. The image of that lamp shade is projected from the source and you’ve done nothing to change that source. Nobody cares about a pretty lamp shade without a light behind it.




Pingback: Tweets that mention Get Real: Your Brand Isn’t The Issue | Rehaul by Lance Haun -- Topsy.com
January 21, 2010 at 9:02 am
Some blame the brand, but I blame the hair. I had that Monster.com – 2005 hairstyle and my career went nowhere.
January 21, 2010 at 10:19 am
That’s a good look. But what do I know?
January 21, 2010 at 11:16 am
Great points. Part of what makes me job so easy is that the Alice brand and the Alice product are so closely aligned. Our value proposition is extremely compelling and then we pull through. Makes for some very happy customers.
January 21, 2010 at 1:10 pm
Wonderful, wonderful post Lance! I’m a Gen Y’er myself and I agree with your perspective on branding: http://themethodofmadness.com/?p=21.
You hit on exactly what I’ve always believed, and what emerging research has begun to show: you are who you are, no matter how much you spin it. People try way to hard to just “brand” what they are in a different light and it’s downright ridiculous.
Shakespeare had it right when he penned, ‘to thine own self be true.’
January 21, 2010 at 5:43 pm
I received an e-mail piece today from Monster.com – I have owned my own company for 4 years, why are they hitting me up? During my 20 year career I’ve probably submitted responses/resumes to 20 positions on Monster with zero responses. I thought I was qualified for at least a few of them. You have to get something back – even if the answer is “no”.
Thanks for your branding input – it got me thinking….
January 22, 2010 at 7:47 am
Wait… Lance, I don’t understand! You mean it’s not enough to market myself? To talk about what I can do?
Are you suggesting that I actually have to do it, too?
Ay, caramba, when did life get so unfair?!
I liked it better when I could read a blog that made me feel good about myself, come up with my pithy one-liner about what I do, and then—after being rejected all day by everyone I reached out to—chalk it up to them not understanding my value proposition.
At least then I didn’t have to work hard and I could blame others for my failure!
This… new “approach” to branding you propose… this is going to require actual effort on my part, isn’t it.
*sigh*
January 25, 2010 at 9:51 am
I like the concept, but I am having a problem wrapping around the example: the major branding campaigns at Monster were focused around product shift and audience transformation (side note, I rolled out Monster.com @ TMP Worldwide way back…)
A decade later, the audience for Monster’s product has shifted substantially.
The idea that “Search for a job” has been the message is correct… but a message for whom? When they rolled out at first : it was targeted towards savvy recruiters at major corporations as a job syndication to major papers. Then it flip-flopped into an aggregation of major newspaper jobs. Then it flipped into an end consumer model.
All of those shifts represented major trends in the job market: ranging from corporate buy-in to end user adoption rate.
+The ability to impress someone online is not defined in terms of how may years of experience you have; but the ability to passionately communicate your talents. I believe talent is readily available at any age.
If we look at personal branding as talent expression instead of experience expression, it becomes a more substantial concept. (Not that I am not saying talent is easy to come by… LoL.)
~Barry Hurd